lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: New consolidate irqs vs . probe_irq_*()
From
Date
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 18:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> yeah. I've put it into a separate autoprobe.c file specifically for that
> reason, you can exclude it in the Makefile and can provide your own
> architecture version. Or should we make the no-autoprobing choice
> generic perhaps?

I like this later option... How may archs actually had autoprobing
implemented and actually used ?

Well, I'll do some grep'ing around tonight as I do the NO_IRQ stuff
and see what makes more sense. I don't think an arch that didn't have
autoprobing needs it now, besides, it's not exactly a reliable
mecanism...

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site