lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: New consolidate irqs vs . probe_irq_*()
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 18:48, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    > yeah. I've put it into a separate autoprobe.c file specifically for that
    > reason, you can exclude it in the Makefile and can provide your own
    > architecture version. Or should we make the no-autoprobing choice
    > generic perhaps?

    I like this later option... How may archs actually had autoprobing
    implemented and actually used ?

    Well, I'll do some grep'ing around tonight as I do the NO_IRQ stuff
    and see what makes more sense. I don't think an arch that didn't have
    autoprobing needs it now, besides, it's not exactly a reliable
    mecanism...

    Ben.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.029 / U:30.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site