lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectNew consolidate irqs vs . probe_irq_*()
From
Date
Ingo, while we are at it,

Do you have any objection if I send a patch making the whole probe_irq_*
stuff optional on a CONFIG_ option ? (turning it into nops like we used
to have on ppc until now, if the option isn't set).

I really don't want to mess with that racy mecanism that makes sense for
ISA only afaik, and it seems some drivers are trying to use it now that
it's there (/me looks toward yenta_socket) and I'm afraid of the
consequences since I cannot see how that thing can work properly in the
first place ;)

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.062 / U:0.164 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site