lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
Peter writes:
> This is where I see the need for "CPU sets". I.e. as a
> replacement/modification to the CPU affinity mechanism

Note that despite the name, cpusets handles both CPU and
Memory affinity.

Which is probably why Hubertus is calling them cpumem sets.

And, indeed, why I have called them cpumemsets on alternate
years myself.

However the rest of your points, except where clearly specific
to the scheduler, apply equally well, so this point is not
critical at this point in the discussion.

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.236 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site