Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:39:50 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement |
| |
Peter writes: > This is where I see the need for "CPU sets". I.e. as a > replacement/modification to the CPU affinity mechanism
Note that despite the name, cpusets handles both CPU and Memory affinity.
Which is probably why Hubertus is calling them cpumem sets.
And, indeed, why I have called them cpumemsets on alternate years myself.
However the rest of your points, except where clearly specific to the scheduler, apply equally well, so this point is not critical at this point in the discussion.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |