lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
Hubertus Franke wrote:
>> be a possible solution. Of course, this proposed modification
>> wouldn't make any sense with less than 3 CPUs.
>
>
> Why ? It is even useful for 2 cpus.
> Currently cpumem sets do not enforce that there is not intersections
> between siblings of a hierarchy.

There's only 3 non empty sets and only one of them can have a CPU
removed from the set without becoming empty. So the pain wouldn't be
worth the gain.

Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.871 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site