Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:00:33 +1000 | From | Peter Williams <> | Subject | Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement |
| |
Hubertus Franke wrote: >> be a possible solution. Of course, this proposed modification >> wouldn't make any sense with less than 3 CPUs. > > > Why ? It is even useful for 2 cpus. > Currently cpumem sets do not enforce that there is not intersections > between siblings of a hierarchy.
There's only 3 non empty sets and only one of them can have a CPU removed from the set without becoming empty. So the pain wouldn't be worth the gain.
Peter -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |