lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/8] replacing/fixing printk with pr_debug/pr_info in arch/i386 - intro
From
Date
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 20:10 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Iff you ever want to replace the above, make sure to do it like this:
> printk_info("Start... ");
> ...
> printkc_info("Ok!\n");
>
> (with `printkc_info()' being a continuation of `printk_info()'. And do the same
> for all other KERN_* variations. This would add real value, since the next step
> is to make the printk{,c}_*() definitions conditionally empty for embedded
> systems and/or systems with few memory.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

I suggest this is the incorrect usage.
Start then Continue then End.
I suppose one could use Continue/End with an implied start
or simply End (ie: printk)

cheers, joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans