Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] replacing/fixing printk with pr_debug/pr_info in arch/i386 - intro | | From | Joe Perches <> | | Date | Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:23:42 -0700 |
| |
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 20:10 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Iff you ever want to replace the above, make sure to do it like this: > printk_info("Start... "); > ... > printkc_info("Ok!\n"); > > (with `printkc_info()' being a continuation of `printk_info()'. And do the same > for all other KERN_* variations. This would add real value, since the next step > is to make the printk{,c}_*() definitions conditionally empty for embedded > systems and/or systems with few memory. > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
I suggest this is the incorrect usage. Start then Continue then End. I suppose one could use Continue/End with an implied start or simply End (ie: printk)
cheers, joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |