[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Fw: signed kernel modules?

    On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, David Howells wrote:

    > I've uploaded an updated module signing patch with Rusty's suggested
    > additions:

    Can someone please put this patch into some context, where it's not
    completely pointless? As is it does not make anything more secure.
    Why is the kernel more trustable than a kernel module?
    If someone could show me how I can trust the running kernel, it should be
    rather easy to extend the same measures to modules without the need for
    this patch.

    bye, Roman
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07    [W:0.018 / U:36.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site