![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi, On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, David Howells wrote: > I've uploaded an updated module signing patch with Rusty's suggested > additions: Can someone please put this patch into some context, where it's not completely pointless? As is it does not make anything more secure. Why is the kernel more trustable than a kernel module? If someone could show me how I can trust the running kernel, it should be rather easy to extend the same measures to modules without the need for this patch. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:07 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||