Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Oct 2004 21:23:13 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: per-process shared information |
| |
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:47:13AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > workloads, rather it's known up-front that no fork()-based COW sharing > is going on in Oracle's case, so in this case, "anonymous" very happily > corresponds to "process-private". [..]
Ok fine.
> [..] In fact, the /proc/ changes to report > threads only under the directory hierarchy of some distinguished thread > assists in this estimation effort.
do you use threads now? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |