[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fw: signed kernel modules?
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 05:08, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:35:59AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >
> > We know _precisely_ what the kernel looks at -- we wrote its linker. It
> > really isn't that hard.
> I agree. We have to be able to detect improper header information for
> unsigned modules today, nothing new there.

No, we *don't*. We check that it's the right arch, and ELF, and not
truncated. Then we trust the contents.

I realize that ignorance is bliss, but if you want to debate this, I
recommend reading some code...


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.889 / U:1.036 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site