[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Fw: signed kernel modules?
    On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 05:08, Greg KH wrote:
    > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:35:59AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
    > >
    > > We know _precisely_ what the kernel looks at -- we wrote its linker. It
    > > really isn't that hard.
    > I agree. We have to be able to detect improper header information for
    > unsigned modules today, nothing new there.

    No, we *don't*. We check that it's the right arch, and ELF, and not
    truncated. Then we trust the contents.

    I realize that ignorance is bliss, but if you want to debate this, I
    recommend reading some code...


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.020 / U:41.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site