[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fw: signed kernel modules?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:35:59AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> We know _precisely_ what the kernel looks at -- we wrote its linker. It
> really isn't that hard.

I agree. We have to be able to detect improper header information for
unsigned modules today, nothing new there. So by only signing the
information that the kernel looks at, we should be fine.

Or am I missing some big flaw in the above argument?


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.204 / U:3.920 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site