Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:08:26 -0700 | | From | Greg KH <> | | Subject | Re: Fw: signed kernel modules? |
| |
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:35:59AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > We know _precisely_ what the kernel looks at -- we wrote its linker. It > really isn't that hard.
I agree. We have to be able to detect improper header information for unsigned modules today, nothing new there. So by only signing the information that the kernel looks at, we should be fine.
Or am I missing some big flaw in the above argument?
thanks,
greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |