[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Fw: signed kernel modules?
    On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:35:59AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
    > We know _precisely_ what the kernel looks at -- we wrote its linker. It
    > really isn't that hard.

    I agree. We have to be able to detect improper header information for
    unsigned modules today, nothing new there. So by only signing the
    information that the kernel looks at, we should be fine.

    Or am I missing some big flaw in the above argument?


    greg k-h
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.021 / U:8.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site