Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:31:05 -0400 | From | Jeff Garzik <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] QStor SATA/RAID driver for 2.6.9-rc3 |
| |
James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 12:05, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>I'll respectfully disagree with James... I think the most prudent >>course of action is to follow the example of SCSI common code. >> >>If the SCSI core is doing something wrong, we should fix that _first_, >>not set a precedent of confusing dissociation. >> >>Everyone knows that Linux programmers engineer with their cut-n-paste >>feature. > > > So you'll be sending me the patches that do this?
I'm just saying you are encouraging inconsistency, which is wrong.
Mark should either a) follow the style you request, _and_ submit patches to clean up the SCSI core, or
b) take the lock, just like the SCSI core is doing.
I disagree with the assertion that Mark's code should be different from the SCSI core.
Jeff
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |