Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:58:31 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement |
| |
Matthew wrote: > One of the cool thing about using sched_domains as your partitioning > element is that in reality, tasks run on *CPUs*, not *domains*.
Unfortunately, my manager has reminded me of an essential deliverable that I have for another project, due in two weeks. I'm going to need every one of those days. So I will have to take a two week sabbatical from this design work.
It might make sense to reconvene this work on a new thread, with a last message on this monster thread inviting all interested parties to come on over. I suspect a few folks will be happy to see this thread wind down.
I'd guess lse-tech (my preference) or ckrm-tech would be a suitable forum for this new thread.
Carry on.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |