![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 14:59, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote: > > > > > Lockmeter gets in the way of all this activity in a big way. I'll > > > drop it. > > > > great. Daniel, would you mind to merge your patchkit against the > > following base: > > > > -mm3, minus lockmeter, plus the -T3 patch > > > No problem. Next release will be without lockmeter. Thanks for the > patches. what do you think about the PREEMPT_REALTIME stuff in -T4? Ideally, if you agree with the generic approach, the next step would be to add your priority inheritance handling code to Linux semaphores and rw-semaphores. The sched.c bits for that looked pretty straightforward. The list walking is a bit ugly but probably unavoidable - the only other option would be 100 priority queues per semaphore -> yuck. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||