| | Date | Mon, 11 Oct 2004 18:01:05 +0200 | | From | Andi Kleen <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.9-rc4-mm1 |
| |
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:58:01PM +0300, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:47:45PM +0300, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > How about the following? > > > > > > remove-lock_section-from-x86_64-spin_lock-asm.patch > > > remove LOCK_SECTION from x86_64 spin_lock asm > > > > > > allow-x86_64-to-reenable-interrupts-on-contention.patch > > > Allow x86_64 to reenable interrupts on contention > > > > > > The former is a fix. > > > > What does it fix? > > Well we don't have lock section anymore since the spinlock text is all in > the out of line functions. So this was really something i missed in my > sweep.
I think the linker handles it anyways, so it's probably not critical (without that it would slash'n'burn immediately)
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|