lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.9-rc4-mm1
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:58:01PM +0300, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:47:45PM +0300, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > > How about the following?
> > >
> > > remove-lock_section-from-x86_64-spin_lock-asm.patch
> > > remove LOCK_SECTION from x86_64 spin_lock asm
> > >
> > > allow-x86_64-to-reenable-interrupts-on-contention.patch
> > > Allow x86_64 to reenable interrupts on contention
> > >
> > > The former is a fix.
> >
> > What does it fix?
>
> Well we don't have lock section anymore since the spinlock text is all in
> the out of line functions. So this was really something i missed in my
> sweep.

I think the linker handles it anyways, so it's probably not critical
(without that it would slash'n'burn immediately)

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.244 / U:0.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site