![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
I feel, the media revalidation issue can be solved by hacking protocol(SCSI or USB) layer and the respective notification of the same to user space by a signal. -----Original Message----- From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Jens Axboe Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:01 PM To: Olaf Hering Cc: Andrey Borzenkov; Andries Brouwer; Greg KH; linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev On Wed, Jan 07 2004, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 07 2004, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 07, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > > > No need to put it in the kernel, user space fits the bil nicely. I don't > > > > see how this would lead to IO errors? > > > > > > Ok, how should it be done on my SCSI and parallel port ZIP? An ATAPI ZIP > ^^^ > > "How"? We need a sane way to deal with removeable medias. > Do you have example code that can be put into the udev distribution? -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||