lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 8 Jan 2004 02:16:37 -0800
FromAndrew Morton <>
SubjectRe: Fw: Performance drop 2.6.0-test7 -> 2.6.1-rc2
Jan Kasprzak <kas@informatics.muni.cz> wrote:
>
> Nathan Scott wrote:
>  : On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:30:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>  : > 
>  : > Nathan, did anything change in XFS which might explain this?
>  : 
>  : Just been back through the revision history, and thats a definate
>  : "no" - very little changed in 2.6 XFS while the big 2.6 freeze was
>  : on, and since then too (he says, busily preparing a merge tree).
>  : 
>  : > I see XFS has some private readahead code.   Anything change there?
>  : 
>  : No, and that readahead code is used for metadata only - for file data
>  : we're making use of the generic IO path code.
>  : 
>  	I have done further testing:
> 
>  - this is reliable: repeated boot back to 2.6.1-rc2 makes the problem
>  	appear again (high load, system slow has hell), booting back
>  	to -test7 makes it disappear.

Is the CPU load higher than normal?  Excluding I/O wait?  If so, can you
profile the kernel while the load is running?

- boot with `profile=1' on the kernel command line

- establish steady state load

- Run readprofile -r

- sleep 120

- readprofile -n -v -m System.map | sort -n +2 | tail -40
(More info in Documentation/basic_profiling.txt)

Thanks.
x
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008