Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:11:08 -0800 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: seperator error in __mask_snprintf_len |
| |
One side note I should warn of - my breakage (if such it be) was not consistent.
To quote my original patch to Andrew:
> Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:54:28 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] new /proc/irq cpumask format; consolidate cpumask display and input code > > ... > > There are two exceptions to the consolidation - the alpha and > sparc64 arch's manipulate bare unsigned longs, not cpumask_t's, > on input (write syscall), and do stuff that was more funky than > I could make sense of. So the input side of these two arch's > was left as-is. I'd welcome someone with access to either of > these systems to provide additional patches.
This suggests that while I may well have broken the output side (what the kernel displays when you read cpumasks in /proc/irq/prof_cpu_mask or /proc/irq/<pid>/smp_affinity), it is less likely that I broke the input side (the affect of writing a mask to these files).
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |