Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:56:32 +0100 | From | Olaf Hering <> | Subject | Re: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev |
| |
On Wed, Jan 07, Jens Axboe wrote:
> No need to put it in the kernel, user space fits the bil nicely. I don't > see how this would lead to IO errors?
Ok, how should it be done on my SCSI and parallel port ZIP? An ATAPI ZIP with 2.4 behaves like that:
nectarine:~ # blockdev --rereadpt /dev/hdd /dev/hdd: Eingabe-/Ausgabefehler nectarine:~ # dmesg | tail nfs: server Hilbert2 OK nfs: server Hilbert3 not responding, still trying nfs: server Hilbert3 OK nfs: server Hilbert3 not responding, still trying nfs: server Hilbert3 OK nfs: server Hilbert2 not responding, still trying nfs: server Hilbert2 OK ide-floppy: hdd: I/O error, pc = 0, key = 2, asc = 3a, ascq = 0 ide-floppy: hdd: I/O error, pc = 1b, key = 2, asc = 3a, ascq = 0 hdd: No disk in drive nectarine:~ # cat /proc/ide/hdd/model IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI
I have not checked 2.6, but I doubt it is smarter.
-- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men!
sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |