lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev
     On Wed, Jan 07, Jens Axboe wrote:

    > No need to put it in the kernel, user space fits the bil nicely. I don't
    > see how this would lead to IO errors?

    Ok, how should it be done on my SCSI and parallel port ZIP? An ATAPI ZIP
    with 2.4 behaves like that:


    nectarine:~ # blockdev --rereadpt /dev/hdd
    /dev/hdd: Eingabe-/Ausgabefehler
    nectarine:~ # dmesg | tail
    nfs: server Hilbert2 OK
    nfs: server Hilbert3 not responding, still trying
    nfs: server Hilbert3 OK
    nfs: server Hilbert3 not responding, still trying
    nfs: server Hilbert3 OK
    nfs: server Hilbert2 not responding, still trying
    nfs: server Hilbert2 OK
    ide-floppy: hdd: I/O error, pc = 0, key = 2, asc = 3a, ascq = 0
    ide-floppy: hdd: I/O error, pc = 1b, key = 2, asc = 3a, ascq = 0
    hdd: No disk in drive
    nectarine:~ # cat /proc/ide/hdd/model
    IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI


    I have not checked 2.6, but I doubt it is smarter.


    --
    USB is for mice, FireWire is for men!

    sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.035 / U:0.740 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site