lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: removable media revalidation - udev vs. devfs or static /dev
 On Wed, Jan 07, Jens Axboe wrote:

> No need to put it in the kernel, user space fits the bil nicely. I don't
> see how this would lead to IO errors?

Ok, how should it be done on my SCSI and parallel port ZIP? An ATAPI ZIP
with 2.4 behaves like that:


nectarine:~ # blockdev --rereadpt /dev/hdd
/dev/hdd: Eingabe-/Ausgabefehler
nectarine:~ # dmesg | tail
nfs: server Hilbert2 OK
nfs: server Hilbert3 not responding, still trying
nfs: server Hilbert3 OK
nfs: server Hilbert3 not responding, still trying
nfs: server Hilbert3 OK
nfs: server Hilbert2 not responding, still trying
nfs: server Hilbert2 OK
ide-floppy: hdd: I/O error, pc = 0, key = 2, asc = 3a, ascq = 0
ide-floppy: hdd: I/O error, pc = 1b, key = 2, asc = 3a, ascq = 0
hdd: No disk in drive
nectarine:~ # cat /proc/ide/hdd/model
IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI

I have not checked 2.6, but I doubt it is smarter.


--
USB is for mice, FireWire is for men!

sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.253 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site