lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.0 NFS-server low to 0 performance
    On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 07:13:46PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
    > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Mike Fedyk wrote:
    >
    > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:46:30AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
    > > > It is not just a problem of 2.6 with those specific network configurations
    > > > - ftp / http / tftp transfers work fine. E.g. wget of the same file on the
    > > > PXA with 2.6.0 from the PC1 with 2.4.21 over http takes about 2s. So, it
    > > > is 2.6 + NFS.
    > > >
    > > > Is it fixed somewhere (2.6.1-rcx?), or what should I try / what further
    > > > information is required?
    > >
    > > You will probably need to look at some tcpdump output to debug the problem...
    >
    > Yep, just have done that - well, they differ... First obvious thing that I
    > noticed is that 2.6 is trying to read bigger blocks (32K instead of 8K),

    You mean it's trying to do 32K nfs block size on the wire?

    > The bz2 tarball is 50k big, so, not too bad for the list either, but it is
    > not a common practice to send compressed attachments to the list, right?
    > It's 5M uncompressed.

    Just post a few samples of the lines that differ. Any files should be sent
    off-list.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.021 / U:2.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site