Messages in this thread | | | From | Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <> | Subject | Re: The survival of ide-scsi in 2.6.x | Date | Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:56:59 +0100 |
| |
Hi!
Can you split your patch and drop cosmetic changes?
I have troubles with reading/understanding it, I assume Jens has similar problems ;-).
BTW maybe we can move things forward: fix ide-scsi.c and carefully remove Onstream support from ide-tape.c?
--bart
On Wednesday 28 of January 2004 14:24, Willem Riede wrote: > On 2004.01.03 14:08, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 30 2003, Willem Riede wrote: > > > On 2003.12.30 13:44, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > If people will have me, I am prepared to take on that > > > > responsibility. I am just concerned that I may not have enough of a > > > > variety of devices to be able to thoroughly test it (unless the DI-30 > > > > is the only one :-)). What do people see as the requirements to be > > > > able to maintain ide-scsi? > > > > > > > > Well...there's currently not a long line of people wanting to do > > > > this, so feel free to send in patches (at least cc'd to linux-scsi so > > > > I can pick them up easily), and we'll see how it goes. > > > > > > OK. You did see the patch that came with the original, right? I just > > > sent it to linux-kernel because the audience there is broader. > > > > > > Linus wants Jens to look at it, so I'm waiting for his response. > > > > It's pending review, I'll get to it tomorrow... > > I guess it's been a long day :-), but can you let me know what > realistically I can expect? > > Thanks, Willem Riede.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |