lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Lindent fixed to match reality
    From
    Date
    David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> writes:

    > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:37:28PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
    > > I've been fiddling with cleaning up some old code here and suggest the
    > > following to make Lindent match actual practice more closely. This does:
    > >
    > > a) (no -psl)
    > >
    > > void *foo(void) {
    > >
    > > instead of
    > >
    > > void *
    > > foo(void) {
    > >
    > > b) (no -bs) "sizeof(foo)" rather than "sizeof (foo)"
    >
    > I can't really see the logic in this, though I know a lot of people do
    > it. I try to stay consistent, thus I do:

    If consistency was good in a language we would all be using
    an RPL or s-expr based language. Communication is clearer
    with redundant information. Making special cases of common
    cases is a good thing.

    Eric
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.035 / U:32.612 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site