Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:46:21 -0600 | From | Matt Mackall <> | Subject | Re: Lindent fixed to match reality |
| |
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:15:56PM +0100, David Weinehall wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:37:28PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > > I've been fiddling with cleaning up some old code here and suggest the > > following to make Lindent match actual practice more closely. This does: > > > > a) (no -psl) > > > > void *foo(void) { > > > > instead of > > > > void * > > foo(void) { > > > > b) (no -bs) "sizeof(foo)" rather than "sizeof (foo)" > > I can't really see the logic in this, though I know a lot of people do > it. I try to stay consistent, thus I do: > > if () > for () > case () > while () > sizeof () > typeof ()
Well, sizeof and typeof are operators rather than flow structures so they're a little different. But what I'm really trying to do here is make Lindent match actual practice (as a first approximation of the community's preferred practice) rather than argue the merits of any particular usage.
-- Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |