![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Frodo Looijaard <frodol@dds.nl> writes: > As I said, I *think* it is safe to have my patch always applied (that > is, stop when DIR_Name[0] == 0, and be careful to add a new DIR_Name[0] = 0 > entry when new entries are added at the back). It would conform to the > standard. But I would not really be surprised if there was yet another > FAT implementation somewhere out there that breaks the standard in some > other subtle way, which works now but exhibits problems with my patch. > That is why I made it a mount option. "stop when DIR_Name[0] == 0" should be added after cleanup. The option is not needed. Honestly, I wouldn't like to add the "add a new DIR_Name[0] = 0" part. The option is added easy, but it is not removed easy. And we must maintain it. (BTW, looks like that patch is buggy) Those stuff makes a change of the normal path difficult really. At the same reason, I removed the fat_cvf stuff. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||