[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH, 1/4] readX_check() performance evaluation
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:52:46 +0100, Andi Kleen <> said:

>> I find this comment interesting. Can you elaborate what you mean by
>> "slightly buggy systems"?

Andi> e.g. one bit ECC errors in memory are quite common. And with
Andi> ECC memory they are not really fatal.

Yet they are a good indicator that something is wrong (not performing
properly) or may be failing soon. I don't think putting on blinders
for such problems is a good idea. Though I agree that the question of
how to report such things without needlessly alerting Joe Clueless is
an interesting challenge.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.067 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site