lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 22 Jan 2004 01:37:48 -0600
Fromhanasaki <>
SubjectRe: Stale Filehandles was: [2.6] nfs_rename: target $file busy, d_count=2
I have been having them consistently with 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 clients 
against 2.6.0 and/or 2.6.1 servers.

2.6.1 and 2.6.0 against a 2.4.x server has no problems.

Jonathan Boler wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:40:31AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> 
>>>I only had a few nfs clients doing light load, (kde home directories, and
>>>such) and was able to reproduce stale nfs file handles just by running "find
>>>
>>>>/dev/null" on the nfs share.
>>>
>>>Have you tried the -mm tree recently? 2.6.1-mm4 even has some new nfsd
>>>patches in there (maybe you should wait until -mm5 though, there are a few
>>
>>Stale filehandles is the main problem right now, and I don't see how
>>nfs_raname would be related (just that it was there while I was having
>>trouble with the stale file handles...)
>>
>>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.1/2.6.1-mm4/broken-out/nfsd-01-stale-filehandles-fixes.patch
>>
>>This one looks particularly interesting...
> 
> 
> I was getting alot of nfsv3 stale file handles with 2.6.1-mm1 so I dropped back to 2.6.1.
> 
> mm5 seems to have fixed everything.
> 
> Jonathan
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00    [from the cache]
©2003-2008