lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro
Date
In message <20040120011734.GB6309@kroah.com> you write:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:57:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > In message <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com> you write:
> > > Rusty,
> > > Christoph mentioned that a MODULE_VERSION macro may be pending.
> >
> > Hey, thanks Christoph for the reminder. I stopped when we were
> > frozen.
> >
> > This still seems to apply. Do people think this is huge overkill, or
> > a work of obvious beauty and genius?
>
> Looks sane. I'm guessing that modinfo can show this?

Yes. Looks like so:

--- working-2.6.1-bk5-module_version/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.~1~ 2003-09-29 10:25:15.000000000 +1000
+++ working-2.6.1-bk5-module_version/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2004-01-20 18:22:46.000000000 +1100
@@ -2081,3 +2081,4 @@
MODULE_PARM_DESC(smp,
"Set this to enable APM use on an SMP platform. Use with caution on older systems");
MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(APM_MINOR_DEV);
+MODULE_VERSION("1.16ac-rustytest");
$ modinfo arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko
author: Stephen Rothwell
description: Advanced Power Management
license: GPL
....
version: 1.16ac-rustytest B13E9451C4CA3B89577DEFF
vermagic: 2.6.1-bk5 SMP PENTIUMII gcc-3.2
depends:
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site