Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro | Date | Tue, 20 Jan 2004 18:47:56 +1100 |
| |
In message <20040120011734.GB6309@kroah.com> you write: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:57:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: > > In message <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com> you write: > > > Rusty, > > > Christoph mentioned that a MODULE_VERSION macro may be pending. > > > > Hey, thanks Christoph for the reminder. I stopped when we were > > frozen. > > > > This still seems to apply. Do people think this is huge overkill, or > > a work of obvious beauty and genius? > > Looks sane. I'm guessing that modinfo can show this?
Yes. Looks like so:
--- working-2.6.1-bk5-module_version/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.~1~ 2003-09-29 10:25:15.000000000 +1000 +++ working-2.6.1-bk5-module_version/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2004-01-20 18:22:46.000000000 +1100 @@ -2081,3 +2081,4 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(smp, "Set this to enable APM use on an SMP platform. Use with caution on older systems"); MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(APM_MINOR_DEV); +MODULE_VERSION("1.16ac-rustytest"); $ modinfo arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko author: Stephen Rothwell description: Advanced Power Management license: GPL .... version: 1.16ac-rustytest B13E9451C4CA3B89577DEFF vermagic: 2.6.1-bk5 SMP PENTIUMII gcc-3.2 depends: Thanks, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |