lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: Question on MODULE_VERSION macro
    Date
    In message <20040120011734.GB6309@kroah.com> you write:
    > On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:57:38AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
    > > In message <20040119214233.GF967@beaverton.ibm.com> you write:
    > > > Rusty,
    > > > Christoph mentioned that a MODULE_VERSION macro may be pending.
    > >
    > > Hey, thanks Christoph for the reminder. I stopped when we were
    > > frozen.
    > >
    > > This still seems to apply. Do people think this is huge overkill, or
    > > a work of obvious beauty and genius?
    >
    > Looks sane. I'm guessing that modinfo can show this?

    Yes. Looks like so:

    --- working-2.6.1-bk5-module_version/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.~1~ 2003-09-29 10:25:15.000000000 +1000
    +++ working-2.6.1-bk5-module_version/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2004-01-20 18:22:46.000000000 +1100
    @@ -2081,3 +2081,4 @@
    MODULE_PARM_DESC(smp,
    "Set this to enable APM use on an SMP platform. Use with caution on older systems");
    MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(APM_MINOR_DEV);
    +MODULE_VERSION("1.16ac-rustytest");
    $ modinfo arch/i386/kernel/apm.ko
    author: Stephen Rothwell
    description: Advanced Power Management
    license: GPL
    ....
    version: 1.16ac-rustytest B13E9451C4CA3B89577DEFF
    vermagic: 2.6.1-bk5 SMP PENTIUMII gcc-3.2
    depends:
    Thanks,
    Rusty.
    --
    Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.021 / U:30.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site