Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jan 2004 20:21:32 +0000 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.6] Altix updates |
| |
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:12:47PM -0600, Patrick Gefre wrote: > Guess I don't understand your point. Do you want us to create separate > functions for soft-struct and bridge address > and TIO and non-TIO - 4 functions for each register access, rather than 1 ?
The right fix would be to only have one, and that one would take the bridge_t. If you really want to have one that takes the pcibr_soft, too make it a small wrapper. But even that would be two and not four, where do the other two come from?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |