[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] Move bv_offset/bv_len update after bio_endio in __end_that_request_first
Am Fr, den 02.01.2004 schrieb Christophe Saout um 14:00:

> > > That's why I need to know exactly how many and which bvecs were completed
> > > in my bi_end_io function.
> > >
> > > Or do you think it is safer to count backwards using bi_vcnt and bi_size?
> >
> > I'm inclined to thinking that, indeed. Those two fields have a more well
> > established usage, so I think you'll be better off doing that in the
> > long run.
> Ok, if you say so. This and the IDE multwrite thing are the only two
> places in the kernel preventing bi_idx to be usable this way. I just
> thought it was nicer.

... but I still need bv_offset and bv_len to be unchanged in the
bio_endio call. Can we please do this?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:0.043 / U:3.772 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site