Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 2 Jan 2004 17:09:09 -0800 | | From | Mike Fedyk <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC,PATCH] use rcu for fasync_lock |
| |
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 10:41:50PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > The best way is to maintain poll state in each "struct file". The > order of complexity for the bitmap scan is still significant, but > ->poll calls are limited to the number of transitions which actually > happen. What's the drawback to this approach?
Where is the poll state kept now?
> I think somebody, maybe Richard Gooch, has a patch to do this that's > several years old by now.
Why wasn't it merged?
Implementation issues? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |