Messages in this thread | | | From | Bill Davidsen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.6.0 batch scheduling, HT aware | Date | Fri, 02 Jan 2004 15:10:52 -0500 |
| |
Con Kolivas wrote:
> I discussed this with Ingo and that's the sort of thing we thought of. Perhaps > a relative crossover of 10 dynamic priorities and an absolute crossover of 5 > static priorities before things got queued together. This is really only > required for the UP HT case.
What? Do siblings in Xeons not compete for cache and memory bandwidth, executions units, and the like?
-- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |