lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.6.0 batch scheduling, HT aware
    Date
    Con Kolivas wrote:

    > I discussed this with Ingo and that's the sort of thing we thought of. Perhaps
    > a relative crossover of 10 dynamic priorities and an absolute crossover of 5
    > static priorities before things got queued together. This is really only
    > required for the UP HT case.

    What? Do siblings in Xeons not compete for cache and memory bandwidth,
    executions units, and the like?

    --
    bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
    CTO TMR Associates, Inc
    Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:59    [W:3.448 / U:0.096 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site