[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectALSA vs. OSS
    Hello list,
    I wonder what's the difference with ALSA and OSS. I have tried both,
    someone may say that ALSA is much better than OSS, but with my
    experience with ALSA I wouldn't say that, I would probably say it should
    be removed from the kernel totally.

    So, what are the reasons for ALSA to become "default" in 2.6?
    I know it gives somekind of nice features, but ALSA didn't let me to
    open two sound sources (like XMMS and Quake3) at the same time, so I
    guess it is not really done yet, or is it?

    Ignore this if you don't care.
    "Software is like sex, it's better when it's free."
    Markus Hästbacka <midian at ihme dot org>
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.018 / U:47.252 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site