Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:30:19 -0800 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: Unneeded Code Found?? |
| |
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 07:58:55PM -0500, Randy Appleton wrote: > Bill Davidsen wrote: > >If you never get a hit, it means either (a) your test load actually > >doesn't have one, or (b) the code isn't correctly finding them. > > > It might be buggy code on my part, but it looks pretty solid to me. > I'd be happy to show anyone interested. > My load ought to find such a merge, if they happen with any freqency at > all. Compiling two kernels > at the same time and "general running" are my two current loads. The > disk queue gets to over 70 > entries, which is rather high for a personal workstation, and I'm > searching tens of thousands to accesses > in total. > > Does anyone know that this code is actualy useful? Has anyone ever seen > it actually do a merge of consecutive > data accesses for requests that were not issued themselves consequtively?
What kernel version are you testing against? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |