lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Unneeded Code Found??
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 07:58:55PM -0500, Randy Appleton wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >If you never get a hit, it means either (a) your test load actually
> >doesn't have one, or (b) the code isn't correctly finding them.
>
>
> It might be buggy code on my part, but it looks pretty solid to me.
> I'd be happy to show anyone interested.
> My load ought to find such a merge, if they happen with any freqency at
> all. Compiling two kernels
> at the same time and "general running" are my two current loads. The
> disk queue gets to over 70
> entries, which is rather high for a personal workstation, and I'm
> searching tens of thousands to accesses
> in total.
>
> Does anyone know that this code is actualy useful? Has anyone ever seen
> it actually do a merge of consecutive
> data accesses for requests that were not issued themselves consequtively?


What kernel version are you testing against?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.073 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site