![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Jan 15 2004, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Doug Ledford wrote: > >On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 04:22, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > >>On Mon, Jan 12 2004, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > >> > >>>On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:19:46AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>> > >>>>... and still exists in your 2.4.21 based kernel. > >>> > >>>The RHL 2.4.21 kernels don't have the locking patch at all... > >> > >>But RHEL3 does: > >> > >>http://kernelnewbies.org/kernels/rhel3/SOURCES/linux-2.4.21-iorl.patch > >> > >>and the bug is there. > > > > > >But in RHEL3 the bug is fixed already (not in a released kernel, but the > >fix went into our internal kernel some time back and will be in our next > >update kernel). From my internal bk tree for this stuff: > > "not in a released kernel..." Do I read this right? That you have a fix > for a critical bug and it hasn't been pushed to customers yet? How about > security bugs, has the fix you pushed in RH-9.0 been push to EL customers? Calm down, it's a bug fix for a deadlock that _could_ trigger on SMP only in SCSI error recovery. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:00 [W:0.440 / U:0.190 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||