Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:10:41 +0100 | From | Dominik Brodowski <> | Subject | Re: Cleanups for powernow-k8 |
| |
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:06:05PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote: > Part of the justification for cpufreq (at least on x86) was an alternative > for when ACPI just doesn't work, or for when folks either don't want to, > or can't run ACPI (through various other AML bugs for eg).
Except that the ACPI P-States implementation also uses the cpufreq infrastructure.
Dominik[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |