Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:27:03 -0500 | From | Joe Korty <> | Subject | Re: seperator error in __mask_snprintf_len |
| |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 03:03:31PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > Joe - question - is there any good reason not to use Paul M's > suggestion, eor'ing the index with 1 on 64 bit big endian hardware? > I have a patch about ready (as soon as I can get time on my big system > to test it) that uses the eor 1 idea.
In principle it should work fine. The details will be in the code of course.
I've been working on-and-off on fixing the equivalent endian problem in __mask_parse_len. How is that part going for you? I haven't yet decided if I want to post it.
-- "Money can buy bandwidth, but latency is forever" -- John Mashey Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |