![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 09:37:00AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > The upcomming gcc 3.4 has a new inlining algorithm which sometimes > fails to inline some "dumb" inlines in the kernel. This sometimes leads > to undefined symbols while linking. It fails to inline routines with always_inline attribute? That sounds like a gcc bug. always_inline should mean inline always, and issue error if for some reason it is impossible. Jakub - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||