![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:10:41AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:06:05PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote: > > Part of the justification for cpufreq (at least on x86) was an alternative > > for when ACPI just doesn't work, or for when folks either don't want to, > > or can't run ACPI (through various other AML bugs for eg). > > Except that the ACPI P-States implementation also uses the cpufreq > infrastructure. Sure, but that came later.. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||