[lkml]   [2004]   [Jan]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Busy-wait delay in qmail 1.03 after upgrading to Linux 2.6
Haakon Riiser <> wrote:
> > Output from time:
> >
> > real 0m0.309s
> > user 0m0.011s
> > sys 0m0.004s
> Just wanted to comment on my own data, since I just noticed it myself:
> The output from time indicates that the system is _not_ using CPU
> while delaying, so you might wonder why I said it did. The reason
> is that I'm using an AfterStep applet (ascpu) to monitor CPU usage,
> and it appeared to work fine in 2.6. Now, I see that there are
> differences: For example, another problem I encountered while
> upgrading to 2.6 was that disk intensive jobs, such as updating
> the slocate database, made ascpu report 100% CPU usage. I just
> ran top (procps 2.0.16) beside it, and it reported approximately
> 10% CPU usage, which is no more than 2.4 used.

2.6 has finer-grained cpu utilisation accounting; probably ascpu is
accidentally lumping I/O wait into system time.

Still, some of those delays seem excessive and if you indeed are seeing
longer runtimes than with 2.4, something is up.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.060 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site