![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote: > > > swapper: page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x20 > > ... > We should probably rate limit that printk. Andrew: I was thinking of > stealing net_ratelimit and calling it core_ratelimit or whatever. Then > wrap these non critical things with it. Overkill? Actually my intent was just to remove it (and __GFP_NOWARN) - it's just development-time debug. But it is handy on occasion. So sure, ratelimit it, make it KERN_INFO and maybe add a dump_stack()? (printk_ratelimit() may be a suitable name) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||