Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 08 Sep 2003 20:06:04 -0400 | From | Timothy Miller <> | Subject | Re: Use of AI for process scheduling |
| |
Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:57:49PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >>On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:28:35PM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote: >> >>>Ok, I know I'm going too far. Right now, the best application would be >>>the process scheduler, but we should start thinking about ways of making >>>the system "self aware" and "self correcting" so that when the model >>>observes the logic to misbehave, detailed information can be produced >>>for debugging purposes. >>>Naturally, I am interested in contributing to this, but some of what I >>>will have to learn to participate will come out of ensuing discussions. >>> I have a lot to learn, but I think if these ideas are valuable, others >>>who already know enough will start to do something with them. >> >>Show me the code. > > > I think he's working on a draft, not implementation.
Yeah, I didn't think his comment was very helpful since I thought it was clear that I was working on a draft of an IDEA.
> Any chance we'll see any code from you (or the group you seem to be trying > to build) Tim?
Well...
Since I don't know enough about the actual kernel, I thought perhaps I could start with writing a generic neural net that could be added to the kernel. The fact that I need an integer-only algorithm will require that I largely start from scratch.
I also need to refresh my memory on how to do back-propogation.
Oh, and most importantly, I need ideas from others so I don't go down the wrong path.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |