lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Minor scheduler fix to get rid of skipping in xmms
Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> For specjbb things are looking good from a throughput point of view.
> ...
> Volanomark, on the other hand is still off by quite a bit from test4 stock
>

hmm, thanks.

I'm not sure that volanomark is very representative of any real-world
thing.

> ...
> If thre is any particular patch/tree combination you would like me to
> try out, please let me know and I will see if I can get the results for
> you.

Could we please see test5 versus test5 plus Andrew's patch?

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch

and if you have time, also test5 plus sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch plus

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch


What I'm afraid of is that those patches will yield improved results over
test5, and that adding

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-2.6.0-test2-mm2-A3.patch

will slow things down again.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.187 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site