Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:56:39 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Minor scheduler fix to get rid of skipping in xmms |
| |
Steven Pratt <slpratt@austin.ibm.com> wrote: > > For specjbb things are looking good from a throughput point of view. > ... > Volanomark, on the other hand is still off by quite a bit from test4 stock >
hmm, thanks.
I'm not sure that volanomark is very representative of any real-world thing.
> ... > If thre is any particular patch/tree combination you would like me to > try out, please let me know and I will see if I can get the results for > you.
Could we please see test5 versus test5 plus Andrew's patch?
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch
and if you have time, also test5 plus sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch plus
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch
What I'm afraid of is that those patches will yield improved results over test5, and that adding
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-2.6.0-test2-mm2-A3.patch
will slow things down again.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |