Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy v12 | From | Martin Schlemmer <> | Date | Sat, 06 Sep 2003 09:49:19 +0200 |
| |
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 05:36, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > Well it would be nice if someone could find out how to do it, but I > > think that if we want X to be able to get 80% CPU when 2 other CPU hogs > > are running, you have to renice it. > > OK. So you renice it ... then your two cpu jobs exit, and you kick off > xmms. Every time you waggle a window, X will steal the cpu back from > xmms, and it'll stall, surely? That's what seemed to happen before. > I don't see how you can fix anything by doing static priority alterations > (eg nice), because the workload changes. >
Not here with version 10 of Nick's patch, and X reniced to -10. I have not had chance to test v12, but will do tonight when I get home.
Cheers,
-- Martin Schlemmer
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |