Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:22:12 +0100 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: kernel header separation |
| |
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:16:04PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: > On Fri Sep 05, 2003 at 03:41:54PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > i think all these _t types are ugly ;-( > > They may be ugly, but they are standardized and have very > precise meanings defined by ISO C99, which is a very good > thing for code interoperability...
__u8 has a very precise meaning defined by Linux. If you're including a Linux header. that's what you need to worry about.
-- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |