Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:05:52 +0200 | From | Matthias Andree <> | Subject | Re: [ACPI] Where do I send APIC victims? |
| |
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to develop patches for ACPI IRQ issues. > > Are these VIA KT333/KT400 chipsets? If so, there's a known bug in many BIOSes > with these chipsets. I'm waiting on some docs from VIA to fix this issue.
I'm looking after a box with EPoX 8K9A2+ board (IIRC), with KT400 chip set. Booting with ACPI enabled (i. e. no acpi=off in kernel command line) makes most interrupts (network, disk) invisible. acpi=off fixes this. I haven't bothered to report this because it's running some SuSE-patched 2.4.20 kernel (they did patch newer ACPI, "Subsystem revision 20030228").
Is testing a newer kernel or ACPI stuff worthwhile or should I wait? It's a production machine, so "see if this works" is out of the game, "it should work" can be tested in times of low load but not necessarily on short notice.
Is this any help?
<6>ACPI: Subsystem revision 20030228 <6>ACPI: Disabled via command line (acpi=off) <6>PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb380, last bus=1 <6>PCI: Using configuration type 1 <6>PCI: Probing PCI hardware <4>PCI: ACPI tables contain no PCI IRQ routing entries <4>PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) <6>PCI: Using IRQ router VIA [1106/3177] at 00:11.0
That 00:11.0 is:
00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge
-- Matthias Andree
Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |