lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: UP Regression (was) Re: Scaling noise
Date
From
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:56AM -0700, Cliff White wrote:
> > On the Scalable Test Platform, running osdl-aim-7, for the
> > UP case, 2.4 is a bit better than 2.6, this is consistent across
> > many runs. For SMP, 2.6 is better, but the delta is rather
> > small, until we get to 8 CPUS. We have a lot of un-parsed data from other
> > tests - might be some trends there also.
> > See http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/reaim/index.html
> > 2.4 kernels are at the bottom of the page.
>
> Do you have profile data for these runs?

For most of them, yes. The link to the profile data is at
the top of the report. Report sorted by load right now.

Also, that webpage doesn't
> have 2.4.x results.

>> 2.4 kernels are at the bottom of the page.

Scroll all the way down, look for the 'Other Kernels'
header. There are results for linux-2.4.22, 2.4.23-pre1 + pre2
for both the new_dbase and compute workloads.

Here's a link to 2.4.23-pre2 on an 8-way, if you don't see it..
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/278651/
cliffw

>
>
> -- wli
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.091 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site