lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.0-test4-mm5

> As a tangent, gem_pcs_interrupt appears to call netif_carrier_xxx but
> not set gem->lstate. David/Ben, is that a bug?

Looks like it is, David, you are the one who knows the PCS stuff ...

BTW. David: Any reason why you wouldn't let me change all occurences
of spin_{lock,unlock}_irq into the ...{save,restore} versions ?

I don't like force re-enabling interrupts the way we do it now with
spin_unlock_irq() the way we do it now. Among other things, that
breaks SA_INTERRUPT semantics and that breaks some pet project of
mine which is to run the IRQ handler with interrupts off when the
kernel stack is below a given threshold (to limit interrupt depth)

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.118 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site