![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Roger Luethi wrote: >On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:13:47 -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >>> As I see there is not that much edge case testing going around. >>> >>It's known what has to be done for it. AFAICT upstream doesn't like >>the answers and just says "throw hardware at it". I've written it off >>as a lost cause, though I was at one time interested. >> > >Well, _I_ don't know that. What are the answers? And while we're at it, >what's the problem, exactly? > > This particular problem was fixed nicely by getting the kernel to enable swap, so I don't think its that bad of a problem. Anyway, I think answers involve sizing data structures more effectively on small memory boxes, more VM smarts in overload situations, and probably most important for desktop use: light weight and unbloated user level environment. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||