![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Am Montag, 29. September 2003 17:00 schrieb Jörn Engel: > > Would work. But I'd prefer to have that information inside the header > files, under some syntax. > > /* attr: indirect header */ > > Is this acceptable? Just a suggestion: Make it a define. Comments tend to be re-formatted, "improved", deleted, etc. You get the picture. So I think that: #define PRAGMA_INDIRECT_HEADER TRUE (or something similiar) would be better suited. Regards, Dominik -- Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. (Francois Marie Arouet aka Voltaire, 1694-1778) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||