lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Syscall security
* Maciej Zenczykowski (maze@cela.pl) wrote:
> I'm wondering if there is any way to provide per process bitmasks of
> available/illegal syscalls. Obviously this should most likely be
> inherited through exec/fork.

A simple LSM module can do this for you. It will have a little
more overhead than denying at the syscall entry point, but it's
certainly going to be more flexible.

-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.402 / U:1.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site