![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> writes: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:15:33AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > In addition there are some major gains to be had in standardizing on a > > distributed version control system that everyone can use, and > > unfortunately BK does not fill that position. So I think it is good > > that there is enough general discontent it the air that people > > continue to look for alternatives. > > Let's just postulate that my claim that this is harder than it looks is > true. You don't have to agree with it, just pretend you do. Given that, > it's going to be a while before any alternative shows up. People mumble > about arch until they go use it for a while and realize it is about 3-5 > years behind BK. Linus isn't about to step backwards that far. Nope. I won't. I would much rather postulate that it is easier than it looks so someone will get started :) > > The current situation with version control is painful. > > No kidding. Do you have any suggestions, _realistic_ suggestions, that > we could do to help? Beyond making plain text patches/tarballs available > from every repo hosted on bkbits? patches/tarballs and a clear way to find them would certainly help. And would pretty much put a project on bkbits on par with the non bk alternatives, for usability. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||