![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote: > On 25 Sep 2003, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > And for the core kernel development this is true. There are subprojects > > that are currently using BK that you can't even get the code without BK. > That's actually a pretty good point. [...] > I don't know what the solution to it might be Perhaps BitMover could release a client that can't do anything but keep a local (unmodified) tree in sync with a public repository tree, so that the "politically objectionable" (to some) parts of the BK license don't matter. In an idea world, this read-only client could be released in source form, but I'm under no illusions there :). Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <linux@discworld.dyndns.org> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||